Ridiculous is a meaningless word until youve seen Thomas Steenburg, Bigfoot field researcher, taking giant strides across Harrison Lakes beach wearing replica creature tracks moulded to a pair of Chuck Taylors. He is conducting an experiment, see, to find out whether or not convincing Bigfoot tracks can be easily faked. They cant. Even in the softest sand, Steenburgs tracksreplicas of the 1958 Bluff Creek, California, prints that catapulted the term Bigfoot into public consciousnessmark only an eighth of an inch of the surface. The tracks he claims to have discovered at Ruby Creek the week before, in late September this year, were three times that deep, indicating a foot structure designed to carry a very heavy animal. He says.
Heres the story: a man from Chilliwack went hunting in the forests around Ruby Creek, about 50 kilometres up the Fraser River from Agassiz. He was in very difficult terrain, a bog so moist and so deep that Steenburg later sank waist-deep while exploring the area. The hunter told Steenburg that something threw a rock at him. When he turned to look, he saw a manlike creature covered in hair walk into a thicket of trees. He believed it was a Bigfoot (also widely known in this part of the world as Sasquatch, which means hairy man in Halkomelem, a Salish language).
Dude! I think that you are trying to make some kind of point. But you are so wrong on so many points through out your appearant article, that I do not know where to start!!!!??? Man! your implications are so off the wall....!!